KONTRIBUSI KRIMINOLOGI UNTUK AHLI HUKUM PIDANA DALAM MEMBERIKAN LEGAL OPINION DAN KETERANGAN AHLI TERHADAP PENANGANAN PERKARA PIDANA
Abstract: Any corruption
casesfound in Indonesia need to behandled seriously by those who uphold the
law, in this case: police, attorney, and judici alaffairs. For so long, the
handlings ofthe corruption cases tend to go far beyond the justice that finally
the society lose their trust to those agencies. In order to anticipate that situation
and condition, the expert's explanations are needed to look atthe corruption
cases scientifically. The expert's explanations are usually related to
constitutional law and criminal law, while some other expert's explanations are
the expert's explanations from the people who work in BPKand BPKP to see
whether or not there is a detriment In general, the explanation from the
constitutional law expert isneeded to see that the misuse of the authority isa
criminalact, while the explanation from the criminal law expert isneeded to
define whether the corruption is consideredas a criminal act or not. Furthermore,
to deepen and broaden the analysis that isdone bythe criminal law expert,
criminology is needed. Thus, a certain corruption case is then analyzed not
only basedoncriminology study and but also criminal law study. The method that
was used to conduct this research was doctrinal research, which was also based
on sociology and analyzeddescriptively. Based on theresult of theresearch,
itcould be concluded that a criminal lawexpert, ingiving legal opinions and any
expert's explanations, should beable convince that the corruption isa criminal
act. The using ofcriminology as the auxiliary studies ofcriminal law would help
the expert to present a scientific analysis towardthe corruption case.
Keywords: corruption, criminal
law, and criminology
Penulis: Rehnalemken Ginting
Kode Jurnal: jphukumdd080108
