ANALISA YURIDIS PENCABUTAN HAK MEMILIH DAN DIPILIH SEBAGAI PIDANA TAMBAHAN DALAM PERSPEKTIF PERLINDUNGAN HAK ASASI MANUSIA PADA PUTUSAN RATU ATUT CHOSIYAH

Abstract: The idea on this jurnal is the analyzing of the rule regarding the disenfranchisement as an additional sentence in the perspective of Human Rights protection on RatuAtutChosiyah’s verdict, which is based on the conflict of norm between Law Number 39 Year 1999 Regarding The Human Rights (UU HAM) jo., Law Number 12 Year 2005 Regarding The Ratifcation of ICCPR (UU ICCPR) against LawNumber 1 Year 1946 Regarding Indonesian Criminal Code jo., Law Number 31 Year 1999 Regarding The Eradication of Corruption Act. The Method forthis research is normative legal research due to the conflict of norms based above mentioned. Thus the additional sentences which were given by the judgesof Supreme Court isstill tend to premature/unlawful from the perspective of Human Rights Regulation in Indonesia. In order to prevent the futurepremature/ unlawful of additional sentence of disenfranchisement whichgiven by the judges,a condition is required by UU ICCPR, it is the offcial emergencyannouncementof the state due to corruption by the Government.
Keywords: Disenfranchisement, Ratu AtutChosiyah’s Verdict, Protection of Human Rights
Penulis: I Wayan Dharma Na Gara
Kode Jurnal: jphukumdd160335

Artikel Terkait :