Kekuatan Pembuktian Keterangan Saksi Pengungkap Fakta (Whistleblower) dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi menurut Putusan Mahkamah Agung No.1390K/Pid.Sus/2011

Abstract: Proof is a process that is critical in driving the success of uncovering a criminal case. The proof will not be realized without the role of the witness in giving testimony. Witness testimony is the primary evidence in Section 184 Criminal Procedure Code. Witness Whistleblower facts is a witness that reveals a scandalous crime that occurred in a government or private agency. The Whistleblower is Komjen Pol. Susno Duadji then served as deputy chief of the Criminal and INTRAC. He is that there are irregularities in the case of Gayus and Haposan Hutagalung with indications of Corruption, which in the case of taxes and Arowana contained in Decision No.1390K/Pid.Sus/2011 MA. The problem is: 1). How does the strength of evidence whistleblower fact witnesses in the case of the Corruption in the case No.1390/K/Pid.Sus/2011? 2). How does the position of expressing a fact witness (Whistleblower) in the case of the Corruption in Case No.1390K/Pid.Sus/2011?. While this type of research is normative, using data sources primary legal materials, secondary and tertiary. Mechanical collection of legal materials to study the document and the data were analyzed qualitatively. Research results proving the fact Whistleblower witnesses in corruption cases is to have a complete and perfect strength and Whistleblower has a very large position in the fight against Corruption.
Keywords: Evidence , Witness , Whistleblower , Corruption
Penulis: Sulaiman Aryadi,  Syafridatati, Deaf Ramadhani
Kode Jurnal: jphukumdd141635

Artikel Terkait :

Jp Hukum dd 2014