RESPON INDONESIA TERHADAP ACFTA: PRO KONTRA WACANA RENEGOSIASI
Abstract: This study aimed to
analyze the response of Indonesia concerning the implementation of the ACFTA to
be addressed differently. This response refers to the ACFTA agreement
renegotiation discourse which then led to a debate among actors from
government, industry associations representative body of the people and
environment of researchers both for and were refused. The main question of this
study is to determine aspects of the contentious arguments of the actors are
pros and cons discourse ACFTA renegotiation. By knowing the contentious aspects
of the follow-up question arises which will lead to the background of the
debate the pros and cons of discourse in Indonesia ACFTA renegotiation between
the actors concerned.
The principles of neoliberalism and Keynesianism approach will be used as
a tool to analyze the debate discourse renegotiation Asean China Free Trade
Agreement within the domestic sphere. This study uses a qualitative method
using data obtained from textbooks, journals, newspaper articles and online.
Secondary data from interviews of relevant actors processed from articles in
the media.
The research findings indicate that the differences in the arguments of
each group of actors that are grouped into three aspects: economic, political
and social fields. Actor pro renegotiation based on principles of Keynesianism
which assumes that under conditions likely to lose money, the state must do
more to protect the domestic industry was the actor who cons ACFTA
renegotiation argue in an effort to accelerate economic growth and
strengthening of the ASEAN region. Differences of opinion in view of ACFTA is
located on the state's role in addressing the ACFTA, differences in economic
interests and differences in the political orientation of the actors involved
in the ACFTA agreement.
Penulis: Elisabeth Kartikasari
Kode Jurnal: jpsosiologidd140558
